UK Global Healthcare Limited v Secretary of State for Health and Social Care [2026] EWHC 561 (TCC) Knowledge Check

SCCSI
(Providing Elite Certification Programmes to Construction Professionals Since 2009)
Explore Our Construction Claims and Contracts Certification Programmes
Presented by
Society of Construction Claims
Specialists International
sccsinternational.org
UK Global Healthcare Limited v Secretary of State for Health and Social Care
[2026] EWHC 561 (TCC) | Technology and Construction Court, London
Before Mr Justice Constable | Heard 25 February 2026 | Handed down 12 March 2026
Knowledge Check
Summary judgment and advance payments in a PPE supply dispute

This Knowledge Check tests UK Global Healthcare Limited v Secretary of State for Health and Social Care [2026] EWHC 561 (TCC). Two pandemic contracts required the supply of 320 million medical gloves, for which the Department of Health and Social Care paid GBP 15.35 million in advance.

No gloves were delivered. The Department sought summary judgment for repayment and strike-out of the supplier's claim, relying on missed time-of-the-essence dates, termination and expiry. The supplier alleged that extra-contractual testing, rejection and failures to cooperate had prevented delivery or displaced the original dates.

Mr Justice Constable found multiple issues requiring a trial, including variation, waiver, estoppel, prevention, the alleged rejection of the gloves and the operation of the repayment clause. The Department's application was dismissed.

This Knowledge Check covers
  • The two contracts and advance payments
  • Time-of-the-essence delivery dates
  • The contractual inspection and rejection regime
  • Extra-contractual pre-delivery testing
  • No-oral-modification and no-waiver clauses
  • The prevention principle
  • Termination, expiry and advance-payment recovery
  • The summary judgment threshold and result
Choose your Knowledge Check mode
Legal Disclaimer
This Knowledge Check is provided for educational and professional development purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The content reflects interpretations and analyses that may not apply to specific circumstances. Contract interpretation depends on specific wording, jurisdiction, and factual context. Always consult qualified legal professionals before making decisions based on this content. SCCSI and its contributors accept no liability for reliance on this material.