Can a contractor withhold information such as as-built drawings and manuals because the employer owes money, and what remedies does non-payment give?

SCCSI
Presented by
Society of Construction Claims Specialists International
sccsinternational.org
Legal and contractual solutions - Payment

Where the contract obliges the contractor to supply information such as health and safety documentation, manuals and as-built drawings, may the contractor withhold it on the ground of non-payment, and what further remedies does the employer's failure to pay give?

Suspension, damages and termination for non-payment

A contractor cannot simply hold back documents it must supply, but non-payment gives it a right to suspend that reaches the documents, along with damages, interest and, in a serious case, termination.

Quick answer

A contractor cannot simply withhold information it is contractually bound to supply, but non-payment gives it a statutory right to suspend performance, including supplying documents, on seven days notice, a claim for damages and interest, and, where the breach is serious or persistent, a right to terminate for repudiation, as Alan Auld v Rick Pollard shows for persistent late payment

A contractor cannot simply withhold information it is contractually bound to supply, but non-payment gives it a statutory right to suspend performance, including supplying documents, on seven days' notice under section 112 of the Housing Grants, Construction and Regeneration Act 1996, the right ending when payment is made; JCT 2011 lets the contractor suspend part only, so it may hold back as-built drawings and manuals while continuing other work, and the ICE and Engineering and Construction Contract forms leave the contractor to rely on the statute. Non-payment is also a breach giving a claim for damages, usually interest, and, where serious, a right to terminate: the JCT forms allow termination on a fourteen-day warning notice, and the Engineering and Construction Contract where a certified sum is unpaid for thirteen weeks. Where there is no termination provision the contractor relies on common-law termination for repudiation, which calls for care, since a single missed payment may not be repudiatory. In Alan Auld Associates Ltd v Rick Pollard Associates persistent late payment across nineteen invoices, though payment would eventually come, was so serious as to be a repudiatory breach.

No simple refusalA contractor cannot just withhold information it must supply
Statutory suspensionSection 112 lets it suspend, including the documents, on seven days notice
Damages and interestNon-payment is a breach; late payment usually gives interest
TerminationJCT on a fourteen-day notice; ECC where a certified sum is unpaid for thirteen weeks
RepudiationPersistent serious late payment can be repudiatory (Alan Auld)

The rest of this solution is for members

Fifty of the two hundred contractual solutions are free to read. This is one of the remaining hundred and fifty, which Premium and Pro carry.

See what Premium includesAlready a member? Sign in