Kevin Demirci Properties Limited v Huw Griffiths Architects Limited [2026] EWHC 353 (TCC) Knowledge Check

SCCSI
(Providing Elite Certification Programmes to Construction Professionals Since 2009)
Explore Our Construction Claims and Contracts Certification Programmes
Presented by
Society of Construction Claims
Specialists International
sccsinternational.org
Kevin Demirci Properties Limited v Huw Griffiths Architects Limited
[2026] EWHC 353 (TCC) | Technology and Construction Court, London
Before Mr Alan Bates sitting as a Deputy Judge of the High Court | Heard 18 and 19 November 2025 | Judgment released 19 February 2026
Knowledge Check
False pleading, strike-out, contempt and amendment applications

This Knowledge Check tests your understanding of Kevin Demirci Properties Limited v Huw Griffiths Architects Limited [2026] EWHC 353 (TCC). The court dealt with applications arising from an architectural negligence claim concerning a proposed student accommodation development in Swansea.

The Particulars of Claim wrongly stated that a joint venture with Sir Robert McAlpine had been concluded. That assertion supported a loss claim exceeding GBP 13.5 million, and the claimant's former barrister signed the associated statement of truth.

Deputy Judge Alan Bates examined how the pleading was prepared, the principles governing strike-out for litigation misconduct, permission for contempt proceedings, disputed contractual privity, late amendments and the claimant's choice of architect expert.

This Knowledge Check covers
  • The false joint-venture allegation and statement of truth
  • Strike-out and contempt principles
  • The disputed contract and amendment application
  • Selection of a replacement architect expert
  • The barrister's role in preparing the pleading
  • The proportionality of procedural sanctions
  • The contractual privity dispute
  • The CPR 17.4 limitation test
Choose your Knowledge Check mode
Legal Disclaimer
This Knowledge Check is provided for educational and professional development purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The content reflects interpretations and analyses that may not apply to specific circumstances. Contract interpretation depends on specific wording, jurisdiction, and factual context. Always consult qualified legal professionals before making decisions based on this content. SCCSI and its contributors accept no liability for reliance on this material.
This is a module from the Society of Construction Claims Specialists International's Construction Claims and Contracts Certification Programmes.
sccsinternational.org
Knowledge Check build V2