Lloyds Developments Limited v Accor Hotel Services UK Limited (Costs) [2026] EWHC 1238 (TCC) Knowledge Check

SCCSI
(Providing Elite Certification Programmes to Construction Professionals Since 2009)
Explore Our Construction Claims and Contracts Certification Programmes
Presented by
Society of Construction Claims
Specialists International
sccsinternational.org
Lloyds Developments Limited v Accor Hotel Services UK Limited
[2026] EWHC 1238 (TCC) | Technology and Construction Court, London
Before Mrs Justice Jefford | Judgment 12 May 2026
Knowledge Check
Disclosure methodology, security for costs and costs assessment

This Knowledge Check concerns an application dealing with disclosure, additional security for costs and related costs. The court decided whether Lloyds Developments Limited should disclose tens of thousands of withheld document-family members, whether Accor Hotel Services UK Limited had succeeded on the composite application, and how the parties' conduct should affect costs.

The parties had agreed in 2023 that responsive document families would normally be produced together. After Lloyds changed solicitors and made further disclosure, many family members were withheld as irrelevant and represented by placeholders. Accor sought production of those documents alongside additional security, privilege review, trust-instrument and Cooperation Agreement relief. Mrs Justice Jefford refused the broad family-document request but treated Accor as successful on the security application.

The court applied proportionality and the overriding objective to disclosure, examined whether the security application had been necessary, and used percentage and item reductions when assessing costs. Lloyds was ordered to pay 75 per cent of the assessed costs after account was taken of Accor's exaggerated security demand and failure on the family-document issue.

This Knowledge Check covers
  • The relevance review and withheld family members
  • Proportionality and the overriding objective
  • The components of the composite application
  • The parties' security offers and demands
  • Whether the security application was necessary
  • Success on the different parts of the application
  • The 75 per cent costs order
  • The reductions made on summary assessment
Choose your Knowledge Check mode
Legal Disclaimer
This Knowledge Check is provided for educational and professional development purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The content reflects interpretations and analyses that may not apply to specific circumstances. Contract interpretation depends on specific wording, jurisdiction, and factual context. Always consult qualified legal professionals before making decisions based on this content. SCCSI and its contributors accept no liability for reliance on this material.