Where a variation is instructed after the completion date, is the extension of time assessed net or gross, and does it put time at large?

SCCSI
Presented by
Society of Construction Claims Specialists International
sccsinternational.org
Legal and contractual solutions - Extensions of time

Where a variation is instructed after the completion date but before practical completion, is the extension of time assessed on the net or the gross basis, and does the late variation put time at large?

Net against gross, the contiguous extension and the time-at-large argument

A variation instructed after the completion date has passed raises three arguments at once: a gross extension to the date of the instruction, a net extension of the actual delay, or time at large. Which one applies decides who carries the overrun and the damages.

Quick answer

The net method applies: the extension is the period of delay the variation actually causes, added to the existing completion date, which may fall before the variation was issued; a late variation covered by the extension of time clause does not put time at large

Where a variation is instructed after the completion date has passed but before the works are complete, the extension of time is assessed on the net basis. The contractor is credited with the period of delay the variation actually causes, added to the existing completion date, not with an extension running through the instruction date and into the subsequent period. Because only the variation's own delay is allowed, the revised completion date can fall at a point before the variation was instructed. The gross method is rejected: it would let the contractor absorb its own earlier delay. The late variation does not put time at large either, because an instructed variation is a relevant event the clause caters for, and a workable extension of time clause keeps the completion obligation alive. Some engineering forms reach a similar result by suspending liquidated damages during the variation delay instead of moving the date.

Net methodExtension is the delay the variation actually causes, added to the existing completion date
Gross methodRejected: it would let the contractor recover its own culpable delay
Effect on the dateThe revised completion date can fall before the variation was issued
Time at largeNo: a variation the clause covers does not set time at large
ContiguousThe extension lengthens the existing period, not a free-standing floating period

The rest of this solution is for members

Fifty of the two hundred contractual solutions are free to read. This is one of the remaining hundred and fifty, which Premium and Pro carry.

See what Premium includesAlready a member? Sign in